Video Search Results Displaying Differently in Google


I was searching this morning for some of the latest news on the plane crash that killed four and critically injured former Blink 182 drummer Travis Barker and DJ AM.

In the search results for “travis barker” I noticed something that I hadn’t seen before – double video search results.

Full sized screenshot of SERP including the double video links to YouTube. Click for full sized image.

Full sized screenshot of SERP including the double video links to YouTube. Click for full sized image.

Here is a clipped screenshot at full resolution of the double videos link…

Seeing YouTube videos in Google SERPs is nothing new. For me though, those video results are usually displayed with a larger thumbnail and a description, as illustrated in the following search result:

Just wanted to post this in the event that it was news to others as well.  I’m not sure if I’m just months behind others or not.  I tend not to do much searching for pop culture terms like this would probably be considered.

Post to Twitter

SEMNE Event Recap: Using Marketing to Enhance Your Search Traffic

Last night’s Search Marketing New England (SEMNE) Event in Trumbull Connecticut was a complete success for myself and four others from ADP and BZ Results.  You wouldn’t think that piling people into a car for two hours would be fun – but it was a great break for a team that has been hard at work for a quite a while now.

Before I get too far, if you need more background on the event please read my preview post that I published yesterday.

So – once we got settled in at the Trumbull Marriott Merritt Parkway, we headed to the hotel bar (common for a search event, right?) and killed about 45 minutes just relaxing and talking shop a while.  When 6:30PM rolled around we made our way over to the networking reception where complimentary drinks and hors d’oeuvres waited for us along with some old friends in the search marketing space.

With the SEMNE events I have attended there seems to be a good mix of SEMNE members with others paying a one-off registration fee to attend.  While I can’t knock the $49 ticket to spend the night with some great company, our company has really enjoyed the benefits of our Corporate Silver Membership.

SEMNE Panelists: (L to R) Chris Elwell, Jonathan Hochman (Moderator), Dawn Briggs, Robert Johnson

Panelists: (L to R) Chris Elwell, Jonathan Hochman (Moderator), Dawn Briggs, Robert Jackson

Opening Notes
Jill Whalen took the podium around 7:45PM and addressed the crowd on some housekeeping notes.  While most attendees were already aware, Jill made mention of Vanessa Fox‘s inability to attend and speak.

Jill also took a moment to highlight the upcoming SEMNE events including November’s event which will be held at the Providence Marriott.

On November 18, 2008, SEMNE will have Nick Gerner speak to attendees on a panel called Inside the Black Box: How Search Engines Rank Web Pages.  Nick is one of SEOmoz’s in-house software architects and search engineers, and he’ll be making a long trip to visit us on the East Coast.

SEMNE member Jim Kandik was also awarded with SEMNE’s free pass to SMX East. Jill continued on from there by providing an overview of that conference in addition to extending a 10% rate for SEMNE members.

Moderator Introduction: Jonathan Hochman
With the general notes out of the way Jill handed things over to Jonathan Hochman.  Jonathan serves as the Director of SEMNE, and is frequently speaking at major search industry conferences.  As President of Hochman Consultants, Jonathan’s work in search engine marketing is extensive and his experience showed in how he led panelists and attendees through speaking sessions and the Q&A.

Jonathan introduced the night’s topic by describing the evolving relationship from traditional marketing efforts to search marketing.  The key to tonight’s theme was to use search to enhance a marketing plan and to encourage search marketing to blend with offline marketing efforts.

Robert Jackson of Hochman Consultants

The evenings first panelist was Robert Jackson of Hochman Consultants.  Robert has a strong traditional marketing background and he used that as a base to start off his discussion points.

He asked the crowd a simple but thought provoking question…

What is a marketing plan?

To help better understand what a marketing plan is, Jackson provided clear examples of what a marketing plan is not.  The examples are some that have come in to him and to others at Hochman Consultants, and they included:

  • I have 5,000 keywords
  • I have a large email list
  • My site has lots of links
  • My site looks really, really good
  • We have lots of analytics data

Okay, so what is a marketing plan? Robert laid out the following principles to help create a solid marketing plan…

  1. Unique Value Proposition (UVP or USP)
    I’ve always called this a unique selling proposition, or USP – but UVP sounds less sales related so I can certainly understand the terminology.  A UVP is something that sets your organization apart from the herd. Do you offer a lower price? Do you provide better service? Have a wider selection? A newly patented product or service?Either way, a Unique Value Proposition is the first fundamental to creating a marketing campaign.
  2. Knowing Your Customers
    Any marketing plan relies on customers to be successful.  And, any successful marketing plan requires you to know your customers. Robert recommends setting your business on what your customers are doing, and reminded us to use tools like surveys to help monitor our customer base, what they’re doing, where they’re spending time online, etc.
  3. Know Your Brand
    While it’s one thing to know how your brand stands out above the rest, it’s up to you to develop an intelligent marketing plan that pushes your brand out in other offline media buys.  Making sure that a consistent brand message is repeated through various mediums is important for your audience.
  4. Competitors: Analyze Their Strengths & Weaknesses
    Maintaining a competitive edge in the marketplace is only possible if you know what your competitors are doing.  Performing strength and weakness reviews can provide you with much more insightful information from which to build a marketing plan with.
  5. Write it Down!
    Simple enough… Make sure you write your marketing plan down and really understand it. I know that for me my comprehension of things is enhanced dramatically when I rewrite any notes or plans – so I can attest to the value of this.

Dawn Briggs of Business.com

Next up was Dawn Briggs, the Director of East Coast Sales for Business.com.  I believe that Dawn has spoken in the past at other SEMNE events – but this was the first time I had attended one of her panels.  One of my teammates, Hunter Satterwhite felt Dawn’s material was the most rewarding on the night.

Here are my notes on Dawn’s materials…

  1. Dawn’s Background
    Formerly with Looksmart, Dawn has been selling search solutions to clients for more than 10 years… Long enough to be in the game before Google even had a search engine.  No joke.
  2. A Telling Statistic
    Dawn quoted a study of B2B clients conducted by iProspect, and the numbers simply blew me away.  Of all the companies doing traditional and search marketing, only 55% linked the same efforts together.  Of that 55%, only 26% utilized the same keywords in their search marketing. Maybe I’m jaded by the effectiveness of search marketing but this scares me. Imagine how well the industry would work if advertisers in general understood how to push complete marketing plans?
  3. Tips for Developing a Strong Marketing Plan
    Dawn brought us through a number of ways in which marketers need to start with a well defined objective.  Otherwise, your efforts can get confused along the way resulting in poor results. While she felt that the integration of SEO and SEM could get better she effectively labeled the combination as a no brainer strategy that every marketing plan should include.
  4. Analytics: Blessing and a Curse
    Interestingly, I learned that Business.com does not currently provide a conversion analytics component to their advertisers. I can understand though too the responsibility that paying advertisers have to measure their own success.. Which brings us to quality analytics and an understanding of them.  Dawn is an advocate for shared analytics where marketing managers and clients can review the same information and understand them as true metrics.

Chris Elwell of Third Door Media

For those who have attended SMX events, Chris is certainly a familiar face in Third Door Media‘s family.  As a partner of the organization Chris spoke to attendees about the formation of Third Door Media and how their marketing plan was created, executed and continues to evolve.  Here are some of the topics I’d like to highlight that Chris presented…

  1. Danny Sullivan as a Brand
    When Third Door Media was formed, the organization sought an opportunity to build a brand around Danny Sullivan and his being the source on Search Marketing Information. Chris went on to say that the organization saw their unique value to be Danny’s thought leadership in the industry.  There are certainly many followers in this industry so I can appreciate the perspective Chris described to us last night.
  2. Unique Content in a Vertical: Search Engine Land
    For Third Door Media, “[content] is the way to start a business”. Chris described how Search Engine Land has evolved around the premise that “one vertical of unique content will cascade into a number of great things for the business” and that this content generation can put you in the position to be an industry leader and expert.  The key of course is to make sure that content is truly unique and of value to your targeted audience.
  3. Email & RSS Subscriptions Fuled Their Growth
    When Search Engine Land first launched, content was the focus. Since there wasn’t an abundance of content though, Third Door Media knew that they had to focus on grabbing subscribers to their Email and RSS channels.  Organic search was responsible for generating 60% of the subscriber base for these lists. Today Third Door Media has 18,000 email subscribers and 31,000 RSS subscribers in less than 2 years of operation.
  4. Providing Value in Exchange for Information
    In the family of Third Door Media brands SMN (Search Marketing Now) provides webinars and on-demand educational presentations.  There is a high demand for this type content in our industry.

    Third Door provides these presentations free of charge in exchange for opt-in marketing information.  This information is then cross referenced and behaviorally targeted to develop profiles on individuals in their database.  These profiles then help shape what future marketing collateral someone will receive from Third Door.

  5. Consistent Branding Materials
    Chris also touched upon how Third Door Media views offline marketing materials such as their brochures and mailers for SMX conferences.  While the materials may be adjusted a bit to accommodate the medium – the messages, colors and content remain very much the same.  Having received dozens of mailers and inserts from Third Door, I know it works too. When I see their brochures sticking out of my mailbox – I know exactly who it’s from without more than a split second glance.
  6. Great Content is Your Foundation
    Chris wrapped up by reminding attendees that the key to getting things right from the start begins with truly great content.  This is what we always hear the recommendations of “do what you’re passionate about”.  If you’re motivated about your materials and subject matter, you’ll have a strong foundation from which to market and build upon.

Q& A Highlights

Jonathan wrapped things up with a great Q&A session that mixed some of his own questions with those from attendees.

Email Newsletters
Much of what resonated with me was the strength in email newsletter marketing. To be honest, I had all but written it off, but everyone agreed – email marketing lists are an overlooked and untapped source.  To that point, there were some tips shared.  First, never send emails out for no reason. If you’re sending messages out with weak content or simply because you want to keep a schedule, your readers will pick up on that and begin to unsubscribe.   A great way to accumulate email subscribers (still) is to provide freebies.  The most common, especially in B2B areas remains whitepapers. You subscribe, you get our free whitepaper. Done deal – because it works.

Online Press Releases
Online press releases have always been effective.  One of the most agreed upon resource among panelists and attendees was the value of PRWeb. For $200 per press release, you’ll get exposure to their network and distribution channels which includes Google News.  Someone, (Chris Elwell I believe) offered stats on the conversion rates of PR Web. He said that their homepage receives 56,000 unique pageviews daily. Of that, 16,000 will see your press release’s title, and 800 to 1,400 will actually click through to the full release.

Importance of Vertical Sites & Niche Directories
Jonathan Hochman made a strong case for vertical directories being a source for new business leads.  Vertical niche sites and/or directories allow you to grab strong prospects attention when they’re in the mindset to take action. He then credited the SEO Consultant’s Directory as one of the best investments he and Hochman Consultants have ever made.  For the price of $50, Jonathan claims a number of his clients come to him through the directory – and closed that point by saying that “if you’re an SEO consultant you need to be in there.”

My Own Conclusions

Considering the topic wasn’t specific to organic search, I wasn’t expecting too much. I was pleasantly surprised by the way the three panelists fed off one another and brought the audience through the various stages of planning and executing marketing plans with search marketing components playing an integral part.

The networking opportunities prior to the actual panels won me over again.  It was wonderful to see Tim Dineen from Indeed again, and I was able to meet Matt Crouch, one of his colleagues.  I didn’t have a chance to meet his other team members – but I love the Indeed crowd.  They’re making some amazing things happen in a very competitive space and it was great to see sucha strong representation from them at the SEMNE event.

Third Door Media also had strong numbers with Chris Elwell, Sean Moriaty, Karen DeWeese, KC Gausepohl and… I’m probably missing more names – and for that I apologize.  I always enjoy talking conferences with the Third Door Media crowd, and with my speaking at SMX East in a few weeks, there was a lot to discuss.

I think that about wraps it up…

Again, a big thank you goes out to Jill, Pauline, Jonathan and everyone behind SEMNE for planning another great event.  Props also to my colleagues who made the 200 mile trip to and from both fun and successful. :)

Post to Twitter

Tonight’s SEMNE Event in Trumbull Connecticut

It’s a long ride from our office in Coventry Rhode Island but we’re putting our SEMNE membership to use! I’m joining three other team members and two designers (including Hunter Satterwhite) from the ADP and BZ Results teams, and we’re making the 99 mile drive to Trumbull Connecticut for tonight’s Search Engine Marketing New England (SEMNE) event,

The SEMNE event was originally slated to have Vanessa Fox‘s panel of Using Marketing to Enhance Your Search Traffic. Vanessa will be unable to make it due to the passing of a family member though, and our thoughts are with Vanessa during what’s certainly a difficult time.

Tonight’s presentation of Using Marketing to Enhance Your Search Traffic will discuss how marketing can (and should) be used to enhance your search engine traffic. With speakers Chris Elwell, Dawn Briggs and Robert Jackson – I’m really looking forward to tonight’s event.

If you’re in the NY Metro Area or Connecticut and can make the drive, I’d love to meet up and talk search with you. Here’s the complete event details…

Trumbull Marriott Merritt Parkway
180 Hawley Lane
Trumbull, CT 06611
(203) 378-1400
Get directions

6:30PM-9:00PM

Speakers

Admission
Admission is free to SEMNE Members and $49 for non-members.

Online Registration
Online registration is available for this event.

Thanks to the SEMNE Crew
As always, much thanks goes out to Pauline Kerbici and Jill Whalen, the co-founders of SEMNE – as well as Jonathan Hochman who helps with the CT based events and coordination.

The Last SEMNE Event: Getting Into Google
I haven’t had a chance to make it to many of the events since we bought our corporate membership, but I have found them to be very rewarding on a number of levels.

The last event I attended was back in May of 2007 and it featured Dan Crow, Director of Crawl Systems for Google. SEMNE has a complete write up of that event including a photo of Brandy up there. Jill also had a write up in High Rankings that’s worth a read.

I’ll try to get a full post recapping tonight’s event on the blog in the next day or so.

Don’t froget to find me if you’re going!

Post to Twitter

Tynt’s CEO Derek Ball Responds to SEO Community Concerns


My lengthy blog post last night regarding the concerns webmasters and search engine marketers have regarding the new Tynt Beta service was met with cult-like following.  While my post received attention from sources like Twitter and Sphinn, where many shared my views – it also helped Tynt to understand concerns and prepare a response plan.

Talk about proactive brand management, right?

I can’t steal any credit here. I spoke with Scott Polk earlier today as he prepared to have a phone call with Derek Ball, CEO of Tynt. Derek was interested in what Scott had to say, and based on the research and efforts that Scott (as well as many others) provided – Derek and Tynt were prepared to respond thoroughly.

Before diving in too far, I’d like to draw your attention to a few resources, cited accordingly:

Hi Eric and crew. Eric, you’ve put a lot of energy and concern in your posting and I want you to know that we are listening and not trying to be a huge thorn in your side. We’ve been thinking through many of the points that you (and others) have raised to our attention. I’ve written a more detailed response on our blog for those who are interested at http://tynt.wordpress.com/ . From your comments I fear that Tynt in its beta effort has already registered so deeply negative in your mind that I do not know if we can win you back, but I do want to let you know that we want to be valuable and useful members of this community and would welcome input on how you believe we can do this.

Hey everyone.  We’ve put some of our thoughts from Tynt on our blog.  If you are interested, please check out http://tynt.wordpress.com/

First, A Note of Thanks & Appreciation

First off, I need to thank everyone who read and weighed in on this issue. My approach was rushed as more information became available – and I know that it was not a great representation of me or my full take on Tynt’s intentions.

I apologize for that.

Reputation Management in Action

In our little niche industry, “reputation management” typically refers to pushing out some negative listings and promoting positive information. That’s skewed because of our professional background though and I want to recognize Derek and others at Tynt for being proactive. They not only responded quickly, but they were willing to listen to what we had to say.

Tynt may still cause concern for many content owners, but the fact that they’re willing to listen and provide resources for us to accomplish what we’re after is commendable.

I think it’s great that Derek not only commented here on my blog, on Sphinn and on the Tynt Blog; he actually took time out on extremely short notice to work with Scott and schedule a call where concerns could be aired.

A Review of My Core Issues with Tynt

Tynt replicates your site and does so in order to allow it’s users to markup your page visually.  Whether users add notes or clipart-like graphics, or simply cover things up… It’s all fair game.  Since they’re actually visiting tynted.net when they do this, it doesn’t affect the general visitor to my domain.  I get that.

Unfortunately, search engines do not.  Or at least have not.  Not yet, anyway.

In my original post I referenced a Google Search for “site:tynted.net” (quotes removed). At the time I mentioned that there were results being served up from Apple Insider in those search results, too. If you click on the screenshot I provided you’ll notice that in addition to being indexed, the pages on www.appleinsider.com.tynted.net also had their content cached.

And that’s a problem for me and other site owners.

When a user accesses a domain on tynted.net, they’re effectively having the visual overlay of Tynt appear over the page they’re browsing. The content on the sourced domain is still being served up by the fully qualified domain being viewed.

If you review Google’s Cache of pages indexed though (such as this one from Apple Insider) you will see that the text from the sourced page is now, in the eyes of Google, owned by Tynted.net.

This creates opportunities for confusion, as site owners now have to battle tynted.net as original soruces of content and information. I know that it’s unlikely that a site as large as Apple Insider would be effected, but that doesn’t create any less of a risk for them or other, more vulnerable content publishers.

Now, Derek speaks a bit to this point in the post on Tynt’s Blog:

…we have been very publicly accused of being ‘content-thieves’ and scraping content from other sites, storing it in our own systems, and serving it up for our own benefit and revenue. When the Tynt plug-in is used, we only ever visit the original site and all Tynt content is simply layered on top of the existing site…

That is incorrect. Once the text cached Google believes the content is indeed that of tynted.net subdomains. While Derek may not have realized it, Google is absorbing the content as if it were served up by Tynt as the cached version of pages show.

It’s worth noting too that last night images, css files, robots.txt files (thanks to Rae for pointing this out) and even webmaster’s sitemaps (ex: domain.com/sitemap.xml) were all able to be served up through Tynt.

Michael Gray Weighs in on Copyrights, incrediBILL Takes a Stand

Everyone in the search marketing space knows Michael Gray. I found one of his Twitter updates earlier this evening to be quite telling:

heh @tynt points for reaching out and trying to fix things http://is.gd/2vCh but I think you are wrong

My personal stance on Tynt is still a bit undecided as I can see the pros and cons of the service. Michael however carries a lot of influence and his opinions are not only respected – but also believed in by many unwilling to form judgment of their own.

Michael continues with two more updates (one in response to muunkky who disliked my approach in my previous post):

Update #2 — if there are any copyright lawyers following get in touch w me I actually have a full legal copyright on some sites be fun 2 see what happen

Update #3 — @muunkky showing copyrighted material without permission on a domain they own

His argument is simple and powerful. If site content is held under copyright, what legal abilities exist for Tynt to replicate that and permit markup on their own site?

If you’re familiar with Brett Tabke‘s WebmasterWorld you are likely familiar with incrediBill (Twitter, WMW Profile), the moderator of the Search Engine Spider Identification Forum and Cloaking Forum. Bill published a post on his blog called Exploring The Tynted Web which featured statements including the following…

Many webmasters take their livelihoods and reputations very seriously and don’t like being [expletive] with so there needs to be a way to detect the use of Tynt and or a way to opt-out of Tynt before this happens or it could get very ugly.

All very telling of his stance.

I remain surprised that Search Engine Roundtable, Search Engine Land and others have not discussed this topic yet.

What I Believe Tynt Needs to Do

There are many folks out there who are unwavering in their criticisms and concerns of Tynt. I applaud those people for holding onto their values and defending their stance.

For Tynt though, the time is now. As an emerging brand, company and service – Tynt will forever be challenged by this in a socially driven space.

It’s up to Derek and others at Tyne to make the right decisions moving forward.  The key for Tynt is to move on with this same approach by being proactive, responsive and willing to listen.  Assuming they do this with the same open mindset demonstrated in the past 24 hours, I’m confident they will find more success.

They will need to get the right people involved though.  Also, there’s a risk/reward with being engaged with critics and industry representatives. Being all of those things can take an incredible amount of time, money and planning.

I hope that Tynt understands this.  Based on some personal emails exchanged with Derek Bell, again, I will say that I am confident in their abilities.

My Opinion of the Response?

I openly applaud Derek and Tynt for being responsive to the concerns and criticisms at hand.  At the same time, I applaud Michael Gray, Edward Lewis, Scott Polk, incrediBILL, Rae Hoffman and everyone else who has weighed in on this discussion in the past 24 hours.

But, I simply cannot form any immediate opinion of Derek’s response. To do so now would be taking things out of context. Tynt, to their credit, is a BETA service at this time and restricted to a particular number of users for testing purposes. I will observe, quite closely, everything Tynt is up to.

But to further form an opinion now (as I did last night) would be unfair.

Follow The Tynt Twitter Discussions

Here’s a list of the people I have seen weigh in on the Tynt conversations on Twitter:

Apologies if I missed anyone.

You can always use Summize to search for tynt, but keep in mind that protected feeds like mine will not appear in those results.

Post to Twitter

Tynt: Stealing Site Owner’s Content & Refuses to be Blocked? (See Also Tynted.net)


If you’ve seen Tynt, you may think it’s cool.  That is of course if you’re a 10th grader and your parents are hip enough to let you on something other than MySpace or Facebook.

The trouble is, Tynt is a straight up invasion of site owner content.  They’re re-purposing all of your hard work and letting anyone – yes, ANYONE – go in there and mark things up as they’d like.

Like many others concerned about Tynt, I’m testing out various ways to block them in their quest to steal your content, photos and media.

Block Tynt on an Apache Server

With many thanks to incrediBILL, Scott Polk and Edward Lewis, there is an IP range that you can block to help protect your site from being Tynt’d. You’ll need to add the following to your .htaccess file, as David Burke provides:

RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^204\.244\.109\.(2(4[0-7]))$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^204\.244\.120\.(1(7[6-9]|8[0-3]))$
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ [F]

The above effectively kills any access Tynt’s IP range has to your site. Pretty nifty, and certainly more comprehensive than some of the original blocks I was performing. The blocks I had were all based on referral string and/or specific IP addresses. The gentlemen listed above researched things further to arrive at a complete range to block.

SEO Consultants Gets Creative in Blocking Tynt

If you want to see how far you can take things, Edward Lewis has opted to protect www.seoconsultants.com. Just take a look at the 404 page he’s serving up to anyone trying to index www.seoconsultants.com.tynted.net

Tynt is on Twitter

If you’re interested in trying out tynt, I’d suggest you check out nothing further than tynt’s profile on Twitter.  In a rich case of layering on some BS, here’s tynt’s justification / claim to fame:

Tynt lets you put contextual relevance and dialog on web pages for sharing and interaction.

“Contextual relevance” ? I may be on a series of rants here with my blog, but you have to be kidding me.  Look what I can do to the tynt homepage if I’d like!

Tynt’s Questionable Example of Tynt in Action

Thanks to Jon Kelly for posting this and making me realize just how poorly represented the value of Tynt is.  If you check out the page on Tynt.com called “What is It?” you’ll see the following screenshot (click to enlarge).

Screenshot of the What is Tynt? Page on Tynt.com

Screenshot of the What is Tynt? Page on Tynt.com. Click for larger version.

Tynted.net URLs Being Indexed

If you’re working for Apple Insider, I’m sorry – because you’re getting royally screwed right now with all the content tynted.net is stealing.  Take a look at this search results for site: tynted.net on Google.

Tynt: Not Good for You!

For reference, there are now 146 results for “appleinsider.com.tynted.net” too.

Tynt and Tynted.net Refuse to Be Blocked

What can I tell you now? You can’t use an .htaccess to block your site from being served up through tynted.net.  They’re using a dynamic range of IPs, so any IP blocks you use is temporary at best.  Likewise, you cannot block the referral source as that too has been bypassed.

And, since Tynt and Tynted.net are not spiders, they’re not actively listening to anything you place in your robots.txt file as well.

Sorry Tynt, I’m not Going Out of My Way

On Twitter, Jeremy Luebke [@JeremyLuebke] provided a possible fix as a Twitter reply to me:

@EricLander Also do a search for proxy hijack solution. THere is one where you cloak a noindex tag to everyone but SEs

(Thanks for permission to republish, as well as for the reply!)

While that could be one possible solution, I believe that most site owners are not going to be prepared or skilled enough to implement such a fix. There needs to be a clear opt-out of this service for *any* webmaster not wishing to have their sites tynt’d.

Are You With Tynt?

If so, please read everything here and correct me if I’m wrong. I hate what you’re doing and you deserve to be up front with webmasters regarding their content and protection. Please contact me if I’m wrong with the above. I’d like to give you an open opportunity to say your piece on this, too.

For reference, here are the folks listed on the Tynt About Us Page:

  • Derek Ball (CEO)
  • Dayton Foster (COO)
  • Kerri Knull (VP Business Development)
  • Allan Mackenzie (Executive Chairman, Board of Directors)
  • Brian Craig (Director, Board of Directors)
  • Guy Kawasaki
  • Dr. Steven Woods
  • Chris Brahm
  • Mark Silva
  • Paul Perez
  • Kelly Graves
  • Serge Klimoff

Hopefully someone from the above list is tracking their Google Alerts and can respond back to us…

Additional thanks to Edward Lewis and Scott Polk for their time in researching this matter further.

Post to Twitter

Ranting: Google & Online Reputation Management


There have been undercurrents in the search industry for years that place Google in the wrong with their hypocritical “do no evil” claims.  For many folks (including myself) their goal of “organizing the world’s information” is bullshit. 

Pure bullshit.

Google is hurting what they once were. Small businesses and startups alike are being penalized every day because Google cares more about profits than they do relevancy.  More about impressions than they do accuracy. And more about stock shares and than they do their legacy.

Google is exactly what they attacked one decade ago with a quality idea – a search engine that gathered the world’s information and presented it to users based on a query.  Simple stuff really, but they have strayed from their original passion.  And that complicates the issue.

All the Money in the World Can’t Buy Happiness
Umm, wrong. Just ask GOOG shareholders. They have forced the company to forget about quality and focus on profits. It’s not a bad idea, but Googlers are still out there touting their “holier than thou” approach to life.  Newsflash Google, you are not who you thought you were.

So now Google has become the search industry’s Microsoft of the 00′s, but worse.  Their grip on the search and online advertising industry is easily comparable to Microsoft’s hold on the PC market – except for one problem – there’s no competitors left to stand in their way.  I mean, the Yahoo! AdWords agreement is like Sarah Palin sleeping with Barack Obama for some minority votes. It’s just… wrong.

And now the Department of Justice is poised to attack.  About time.

Why it Pisses Me Off
As more client emails come across my desktop asking me to evaluate their needs for online reputation management.  I can’t help but think of how weird the world we live in is. There are hundreds of thousands of businesses out there who want to do right for their clients.  They still have their passion to serve clients. They still understand that morals can be more valuable than coin. Yet, they continue suffer at the hands of Google daily.

And Google turns away seeming to ignore the issue.

Just as Wikipedia dominates general SERPs, RipOffReport, ComplaintsBoard, PissedConsumer and the like continue to litter branded search results for unsuspecting companies.  And half the time the “reviews” posted are unfactual claims and speculated rubbish.

I’ve recently been involved in few studies that have proven negative commentary and reviews to be false.  In other words, Google is out there promoting inaccurate information distributed with nothing more than commercial or biased intentions.

In one case an ex-employee tried to get payback on his employer, so he played every card he could to attack them.  In another case a competitor hired social media personalities to negatively influence rating and review sites before uleashing them on the above mentioned “consumer advocacy sites”.

What About Google’s Reputation?
So I’m curious Google… When are you going to begin to watch your own back?  If the Department of Justice lays the hurt down on you, I’d applaud them.  And then I’d keep an eye on you like a massive train wreck being played out in slow motion in beautiful high definition right before my eyes.

I don’t want to see you hurt.  I just want to see your brand damaged.  Tarnished a bit.  I want to see your $425 per share stock drop into the $300′s.  I want to see people get uncomfortable, uneasy and scared.  I want all of this because I believe it is time for you to react.

I love what you’ve done for the search industry. I also love the impact you’ve had on my life both personally and professionally.  There are times though when your levels of hypocrisy and inaccuracies ruin it all for me. You’re the hot girl at the high school dance that you somehow score a dance with – only to have her reek like tequila and vomit once up close.

While you’ve been successful, you’re all grown up.  It’s time to take some responsibility, don’t you think?  An engine that is now more than 10 years old cannot be out there making so many assumptions about the materials you index and provide to unsuspecting or ignorant users.

You’re in a position where you are being trusted to provide *factual* results and information to your users based on their search behaviors.  And lately, all you care about is making that click and earning that ad revenue.  I find myself going back to read: Google’s riches rely on ads, algorithms, and worldwide confusion; ‘Please ignore the cash machine behind the curtain’ By Cade Metz who quoted my good friend Adam:

“You’re kind of at the mercy of Google,” says Adam Audette, founder of AudetteMedia, a boutique search marketing shop out of Bend, Oregon. “They make everything as intuitive and as easy as possible right out of the gate – and that’s a nice bonus for people who don’t know have a lot of experience with Adwords. But on the flip side, hiding the complexities of AdWords makes Google the most money. There’s at least the potential for a conflict of interest.”

I can’t fault you for making money. I can however ask you to take a step back and look at yourself in the mirror for a change. At what point do you cross the line, create an indelible conflict of interest and eventually implode under the pressures of the investigative eye?

You’re on shaky ground, Google. Billions of dollars won’t change that.

It’s All About the Response
What would happen if we all posted our negative experiences Google on the leading sites for consumers?  Well, it seems like people already have done that – and they’re not getting any response from Google.

Not exactly surprising, but in a world where your reputation change change in an instant online, you’d think that the folks who took the time to post the above problems would at least get a response from Google.  Even if they’re simply ignorant to the advertising systems and TOS.

But really… Who am I kidding? Most Googlers are just filling out more deposit slips and sell orders, right?

[Hat nod to Dr. Pete from usereffect for typo notification after post went live.]

Post to Twitter

viagra online